The Oil and Natural Gas Subsector Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Model (ONG-C2M2) can help oil and natural gas (ONG) organizations evaluate their cybersecurity programs and make improvements. These tools allow owners and operators in the electricity and ONG sectors to assess their cybersecurity capabilities. Additionally, the tool can inform individuals on how to address their needs and invest in improving cybersecurity.
This program supports the ongoing development and measurement of cybersecurity capabilities within the ONG subsector. Here is a quick guide to understanding the basics of the ONG-C2M2 model and its uses.
ONG-C2M2 Model Architecture
The model is a set of industry-vetted cybersecurity practices, grouped into 10 domains and arranged according to maturity level. Each domain is a logical grouping of cybersecurity practices. Each practice is defined and ordered by four maturity indicator levels (MIL0 through MIL3), which apply independently to each domain in the model. The MILs define a dual progression of maturity: approach and institutionalization.
The model can be used to:
- Strengthen cybersecurity capabilities in the ONG subsector
- Enable ONG organizations to effectively and consistently evaluate and benchmark cybersecurity capabilities
- Share knowledge, best practices and relevant references within the subsector as a means to improve cybersecurity capabilities
- Enable ONG organizations to prioritize actions and investments to improve cybersecurity
Assess Security Operation Center (SOC) with C2M2
Organizations can adopt an iterative approach with four distinct phases when leveraging the C2M2 model to define a cyber resilience program.
The evaluation is performed on existing SOC capabilities for people, process and technology based on the threat landscape. All 10 domains will be rated from MIL0 to MIL3 depending on how functions have been deployed. The assessment is carried out using interview sessions and verifying documents. The results are compared with the organization’s ideal maturity level.
2. Gap Analysis for ONG-C2M2
The assessment gaps are analyzed, and specific projects and programs are defined to build or improve maturity. The projects are discussed with the chief information security officer and other security leaders to determine how to best align a plan to their business strategy.
3. Prioritizing Projects
Projects identified during the gap analysis are prioritized based on risk mitigation and time to value. Each project is analyzed based upon timelines, impact and effort required to complete the project. Timelines can consist of a year or two depending on the number and complexity of projects.
4. Implementing Your Plan for ONG-C2M2
You will build a roadmap to transform your current SOC maturity to a target or to-be state. Your plan should consist of multiple phases.
The initial phase focuses on quick wins to realize an early impact within a short timeline. Future phases should be carried out within a six- to 12-month timeline. Each of these phases will result in increased maturity.
A maturity assessment for SOCs is important to determine if the current tools, technology and processes have the resilience to counter cyber threats. Traditionally, the focus of SOCs has been around maturity in IT; however, now it’s time to assess the operational technology and consider the increase in cyber threats and risks toward this industry.
This post appeared first on Security Intelligence
Author: Asheesh Kumar